Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Proof of absence: al Qaeda and Saddam unconnected

The invaluable McClatchy News Service reports on a new Pentagon study which definitively shows to be true what many of us have been arguing all along:


An exhaustive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were captured after the 2003 U.S. invasion has found no evidence that Saddam Hussein’s regime had any operational links with Osama bin Laden’s al Qaida terrorist network.

...President Bush and his aides used Saddam’s alleged relationship with al Qaida, along with Iraq’s supposed weapons of mass destruction, as arguments for invading Iraq after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld claimed in September 2002 that the United States had “bulletproof” evidence of cooperation between the radical Islamist terror group and Saddam’s secular dictatorship.

Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell cited multiple linkages between Saddam and al Qaida in a watershed February 2003 speech to the United Nations Security Council to build international support for the invasion. Almost every one of the examples Powell cited turned out to be based on bogus or misinterpreted intelligence.

As recently as last July, Bush tried to tie al Qaida to the ongoing violence in Iraq. “The same people that attacked us on September the 11th is a crowd that is now bombing people, killing innocent men, women and children, many of whom are Muslims,” he said.












So, in spite of what they have been telling us for years, and the bullshit that McCain peddles about al Qaeda in Iraq, I guess this means it's pretty well fucking confirmed:

No connection before the Cheney-Bush invasion created a reason and an opportunity for al Qaeda to establish a presence in Iraq.

Damn it.

I'm still angry about this.