A semblance of strategy

Since my earlier post, in which I realized that the US no longer has even the semblance of a strategy in Iraq, PAF has been scouring the internets for the semblance of a strategy. Now this is a strategy:



Of course, if you wanted to nitpick, you could belabor the point that this is a strategy for a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Russia, and is totally irrelevant to the Global War on Terror. But in defense of the Turgidson Strategy, I would point out that it is no less relevant to the GWOT than was our attack on Iraq. So it's no less likely to defeat the terrorists, and therefore worth a try.

PAF's new slogan for the GWOT:

Duck and cover, or the terrorists win.